Loading... Please wait...Turning Knowledge Into Opportunity !
Among the numerous categories in the evolving field of newly synthesized nanomaterials, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are perhaps among the most dynamic and undergoing the most rapid pace of development. The past 5 years have witnessed relentless growth in the research, development, and technological understanding of these remarkable materials. Universities, small businesses, and start-ups, as well as large corporations, have continued to probe and exploit numerous commercial possibilities for these fascinating materials. As a result, the list of product applications is expanding considerably and is projected to do so well into the future.
The most tangible evidence for growth and interest is reflected by the emergence of new CNT producers now capable of offering CNTs in commercial-scale quantities—in kilograms, tonnes, and even hundreds of tonnes, depending on the specific grade—at more affordable and increasingly competitive unit pricing. In addition, after several years of incubation, there is a new breed of more mature university spin-offs, or nanotechnology companies, targeting specific application sectors. Additional evidence of growth is the increasing presence of larger, more established corporations that recognize the future market opportunities offered by CNTs. Finally, over the past 5 years, there has been phenomenal growth in patent activity. For instance, in 2009 alone, the number of issued CNT-related U.S. patents is estimated to reach almost 1,000, a record. For patents pending, the situation is even more dramatic, approaching a cumulative backlog from 2001 to mid-2009 now totaling 10,830, more than doubling the output of 4,400 patents filed during 2001 to 2006, the period covered in the previous edition of this report.
In view of the technical momentum, representing a multibillion-dollar technology investment, and the enormous business potential, this report provides a timely update on CNTs—their level of technically maturity, where they are starting to penetrate the market place, and when and where the broadening CNT market will be in the immediate future.
The primary objective of this report is threefold:
The report is divided into the five major chapters:
TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW defines, outlines the history, describes the production methodology, identifies the unique properties of various forms of CNTs, and emphasizes the major application challenges.
PATENT ANALYSIS provides an extensive search/analysis of U.S. issued and pending patents (along with Canadian, European and WPTO databases where there is no USPTO presence), a collation of the main technical/application sectors and identifies the most active organizations—U.S. and foreign—driving CNT technology.
INDUSTRY STRUCTURE AND COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS identifies current producers, progress in continuous production scale-up, market segmentation, and an industry profile covering the major players.
MARKETS BY APPLICATION represents the body of the report assessing the latest progress and technical readiness in the major application sectors of composites, electronics, energy storage, membranes, sensors, and other applications.
MARKET ANALYSIS identifies the most promising applications realizable within the next 5 years and estimates the potential revenues of producers based on their competitiveness, technical readiness, and the projected market size.
This Report:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter- 1:
INTRODUCTION
|
MOTIVATION |
1 |
|
OBJECTIVES AND PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT |
1 |
|
SCOPE OF REPORT |
2 |
|
CONTRIBUTION OF THE STUDY AND TARGET AUDIENCE |
2 |
|
METHODOLOGY AND SOURCES OF INFORMATION |
3 |
|
REPORTS |
3 |
|
MONTHLY NEWSLETTER |
4 |
|
DISCLAIMER |
4 |
Chapter-2:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
5 |
|
SUMMARY TABLE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CNT GRADES BASED ON COMMITED PRODUCTION, THROUGH 2014 ($ MILLIONS) |
6 |
|
SUMMARY FIGURE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CNT GRADES BASED ON COMMITTED PRODUCTION, 2009-2014 ($ MILLIONS) |
6 |
Chapter-3:
TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW
|
WHAT ARE CNTS? |
7 |
|
FIGURE 1 FORMATION OF A SWNT STRUCTURE |
7 |
|
FIGURE 2 CNT STRUCTURES |
8 |
|
A BRIEF HISTORY OF NANOTUBES |
8 |
|
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SOME CNT LANDMARK DEVELOPMENTS, 1953-2009 |
9 |
|
COMPARISON OF CARBON COMPOUNDS |
10 |
|
TABLE 2 SOME COMPARATIVE PROPERTIES OF CARBON ALLOTROPES |
10 |
|
DIAMOND |
11 |
|
Diamondoids |
11 |
|
Nanocrystalline Diamond and CNT Hybrid Films |
12 |
|
GRAPHITE |
13 |
|
FULLERENES |
14 |
|
Spherical Form: Buckminsterfullerene |
14 |
|
Cylindrical Form: CNTs |
15 |
|
Hybrid Form: Carbon NanoBuds |
15 |
|
Linear Form: Carbynes |
16 |
|
CARBON NANOFIBERS |
16 |
|
CARBON NANOSPHERES |
17 |
|
CARBIDE-DERIVED MESOPOROUS CARBON |
17 |
|
PROPERTIES OF CNTS |
18 |
|
TABLE 3 SOME CHARACTERISTIC PROPERTIES OF CNTS |
19 |
|
TABLE 4 COMPARATIVE PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENT CNTS AND CFS |
20 |
|
APPLICATIONS OF CNTS |
20 |
|
TABLE 5 DIVERSE RANGE OF INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS FOR CNTS |
20 |
|
TABLE 6 SOME EXAMPLES OF OPTIMUM FORMS OF CNTS REQUIRED FOR DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS |
21 |
|
OTHER TYPES OF NANOTUBE COMPOUNDS |
21 |
|
SYNTHETIC INORGANIC NANOTUBES |
21 |
|
TABLE 7 PROPERTIES AND APPLICATIONS OF SOME INORGANIC NANOTUBES |
23 |
|
NATURAL INORGANIC NANOTUBES |
24 |
|
ORGANIC NANOTUBES |
25 |
|
NANOTUBE PRODUCTION |
25 |
|
TABLE 8 COMPARISON OF THE MOST COMMON TYPES OF CNT BATCH PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES |
26 |
|
ARC DISCHARGE |
26 |
|
LASER ABLATION |
27 |
|
CVD |
27 |
|
SYNTHETIC PROCESSES FACTORS AFFECTING GROWTH |
28 |
|
TABLE 9 SYNTHETIC PROCESS FACTORS AFFECTING CNT GROWTH |
28 |
|
CONTINUOUS SCALABLE PRODUCTION |
28 |
|
TABLE 10 COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF CNT PROCESSES |
29 |
|
TABLE 11 COMPARISON OF SEVERAL SWNT CONTINUOUS PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES |
30 |
|
CVD |
30 |
|
Flame Combustion |
31 |
|
Plasma Torch |
32 |
|
Other Developments |
35 |
|
Catalyst-Free SWNTs |
35 |
|
Chiral-Specific Growth Catalysts |
36 |
|
Nonmetallic Catalysts |
37 |
|
Natural Lava Catalysts |
37 |
|
Pulsed Laser Vaporization (PLV) |
37 |
|
Purer and Controlled Diameter SWNTs |
38 |
|
Varying Carbon Feedstock |
38 |
|
PURIFICATION AND PRODUCT QUALITY CONTROL |
39 |
|
TABLE 12 COMMON CNT CHEMICAL PURIFICATION PROCESSES, OUTCOMES AND DISADVANTAGES |
40 |
|
TABLE 13 HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT IN SEPARATION, PURIFICATION, CAPPING AND UNCAPPING OF CNTS BASED ON U.S. PATENTS |
41 |
|
CNT APPLICATIONS INTEGRATION |
42 |
|
TABLE 14 LEADING U.S. RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS SPEARHEADING CNT SYNTHESIS AND APPLICATIONS DEVELOPMENT |
42 |
|
SURFACE CHEMICAL FUNCTIONALIZATION |
43 |
|
TABLE 15 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN CHEMICAL FUNCTIONALIZATION OF CNTS AND POSSIBLE APPLICATIONS |
43 |
|
TABLE 16 EXEMPLARY U.S. PATENTS RELATING TO CNT CHEMICAL FUNCTIONALIZATION |
44 |
|
TABLE 17 ORGANIZATIONS OFFERING SURFACE FUNCTIONALIZED CNT DISPERSIONS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS |
45 |
|
SEPARATING ELECTRONIC STRUCTURES |
45 |
|
TABLE 18 NOTABLE DEVELOPMENTS IN SORTING ELECTRONIC GRADE CNTS |
46 |
|
CNT GROWTH AND DEVICE FABRICATION |
47 |
|
TABLE 19 EXEMPLARY U.S. PATENTS RELATING TO SELF-ASSEMBLY AND ORGANIZATION OF CNTS |
48 |
|
TABLE 20 SCALABLE DEVICE INTEGRATION OF CNTS |
49 |
|
OTHER FORM FACTORS |
50 |
|
TABLE 21 EXEMPLARY U.S. PATENTS RELATING TO THE USE OF CNTS AS NANOTEMPLATES |
50 |
|
DWNTS AND BUCKYPAPER |
50 |
|
FWNTS |
51 |
|
SWNT-BASED PEAPODS OR NANO TEST TUBES |
52 |
|
MWNT-BASED MICROCAPSULES |
52 |
|
OTHER FORMS OF CNTS |
53 |
|
TABLE 22 RECENT RESEARCH DEVELOPMENTS IN OTHER CNT VARIANTS |
53 |
|
DRY SPINNING OF CNT FIBERS AND SHEET FORMING YARNS |
53 |
|
WET SPINNING OF SWNTS |
55 |
|
CONTINUOUSLY GROWN SWNT FIBERS |
56 |
|
CONTINUOUSLY GROWN SWNT NONWOVEN TRANSPARENT FILMS |
57 |
|
CNT REINFORCED POLYMER FIBERS |
57 |
Chapter-4:
PATENT ANALYSIS
|
RATIONALE AND METHODOLOGY |
59 |
|
U.S. PATENTS ISSUED |
60 |
|
CHRONOLOGICAL GROWTH TRENDS IN PATENT ACTIVITY |
60 |
|
FIGURE 3 CNT PATENTS ISSUED, 1994-2009 (CUMULATIVE TOTAL: 4,434) |
60 |
|
PATENT ACTIVITY CLASSIFIED BY INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION SECTOR |
61 |
|
FIGURE 4 BREAKDOWN OF THE MAIN INDUSTRY/APPLICATION SECTORS DERIVED FROM U.S. CNT ISSUED PATENTS, 1994–2004 (%) |
62 |
|
TABLE 23 INDUSTRIAL SECTORS AND EXEMPLARY APPLICATIONS EMERGING FROM ISSUED U.S. CNT PATENTS, 1994–2009 |
63 |
|
FIGURE 5 BREAKDOWN OF THE MAIN INDUSTRY/APPLICATION SECTORS FROM U.S. CNT ISSUED PATENTS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (%) |
64 |
|
FIGURE 6 NUMBER OF U.S. AND FOREIGN CNT PATENTS ISSUED, CLASSIFIED ACCORDING TO INDUSTRIAL/APPLICATIONS SECTORS, 1994-2002 (NUMBER) |
65 |
|
FIGURE 7 NUMBER OF U.S. AND FOREIGN CNT PATENTS ISSUED, CLASSIFIED ACCORDING TO INDUSTRY/APPLICATION SECTOR, 2003 AND 2004 (NUMBER) |
66 |
|
FIGURE 8 NUMBER OF U.S. AND FOREIGN CNT PATENTS ISSUED, CLASSIFIED ACCORDING TO INDUSTRIAL/APPLICATION SECTOR, 2007 TO JUN 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
68 |
|
Comparison of U.S. Patent Activity with Asian, European, and Other Countries |
68 |
|
FIGURE 9 U.S. VERSUS ASIAN CNT PATENTS ISSUED, 1994–2004 (NUMBER) |
69 |
|
FIGURE 10 EUROPEAN AND OTHER COUNTRIES WITH U.S. CNT ISSUED PATENTS, 1994–2004 (NUMBER) |
70 |
|
FIGURE 11 U.S. CNT PATENTS ISSUED: ASIA, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
71 |
|
FIGURE 12 U.S. CNT PATENTS ISSUED: EUROPEAN AND OTHER COUNTRIES, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
72 |
|
Domestic Patent Activity |
72 |
|
FIGURE 13 LEADING U.S. STATES WITH U.S. CNT ISSUED PATENTS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
73 |
|
Small Businesses |
74 |
|
TABLE 24 LEADING SMALL U.S. BUSINESSES WITH CNT ISSUED AND PENDING PATENT APPLICATIONS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
74 |
|
TABLE 25 OTHER SMALL U.S. BUSINESSES WITH MULTIPLE CNT ISSUED AND PENDING PATENT APPLICATIONS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
75 |
|
Large Businesses |
76 |
|
TABLE 26 LEADING LARGE U.S. BUSINESSES WITH CNT ISSUED AND PENDING PATENT APPLICATIONS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
77 |
|
TABLE 27 OTHER LARGE U.S. BUSINESSES WITH MULTIPLE CNT ISSUED AND PENDING PATENT APPLICATIONS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
77 |
|
Academic Institutions |
78 |
|
TABLE 28 CNT ISSUED AND PENDING PATENT APPLICATIONS AMONG LEADING U.S. ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
79 |
|
Government and Other Not-for-Profit Institutions |
80 |
|
TABLE 29 U.S. GOVERNMENT AND OTHER INSTITUTIONS WITH CNT ISSUED AND PENDING PATENT APPLICATIONS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
80 |
|
U.S. Patent Activity According to Foreign Ownership |
80 |
|
Leading Japanese Companies |
80 |
|
TABLE 30 CNT ISSUED AND PENDING PATENT APPLICATIONS FOR LEADING JAPANESE ORGANIZATIONS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
81 |
|
Leading Korean and Taiwanese Organizations |
81 |
|
TABLE 31 U.S. CNT ISSUED AND PENDING PATENT APPLICATIONS FOR LEADING KOREAN AND TAIWANESE ORGANIZATIONS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
82 |
|
Leading Organizations in European and Other Countries |
82 |
|
TABLE 32 CNT ISSUED AND PENDING PATENTS FOR LEADING ORGANIZATIONS IN EUROPE AND OTHER COUNTRIES, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
82 |
|
U.S. PATENTS PENDING |
83 |
|
FIGURE 14 GROWTH AND BACKLOG IN U.S. PATENTS FILED 2001-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
84 |
|
CHALLENGES IN PATENTING NANOTECHNOLOGY |
84 |
|
PATENT BACKLOG |
84 |
|
WHO OWNS WHAT? |
85 |
|
QUALITY VERSUS QUANTITY |
86 |
|
A NEW BREED OF PATENT BROKERAGE COMPANIES |
86 |
|
PATENT TROLL |
86 |
Chapter-5:
INDUSTRY STRUCTURE AND COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
|
OVERVIEW |
87 |
|
INDUSTRY STRUCTURE |
87 |
|
NANOTUBE PRODUCERS |
88 |
|
TABLE 32 INFLUENTIAL PLAYERS INVOLVED IN LARGE-SCALE CNT PRODUCTION AND MARKET EXPLOITATION |
88 |
|
TABLE 33 INFLUENTIAL PLAYERS INVOLVED IN SMALL-SCALE CNT PRODUCTION AND/OR SPECIALIZED MARKET EXPLOITATION |
89 |
|
MARKET SEGMENTATION |
90 |
|
TABLE 34 MARKET SEGMENTATION OF CNT INDUSTRY |
91 |
|
COMPANY PROFILES: CNT PRODUCERS |
91 |
|
Arkema |
91 |
|
Bayer MaterialScience AG |
93 |
|
TABLE 35 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN COMMERCIALIZING BAYER MATERIALSCIENCE MWNTS |
94 |
|
Canatu, Ltd. |
95 |
|
Catalytic Materials, LLC/Catalyx Nanotech |
96 |
|
CNano Technology, Ltd. |
97 |
|
Fullerene International Corp. |
99 |
|
Hanwha Nanotech Corp. |
99 |
|
Hodogaya Chemical Co. Ltd./Mitsui & Co. |
100 |
|
Hyperion Catalysis Int’l Inc. |
101 |
|
MER Corp. |
103 |
|
Nanocyl S.A. |
104 |
|
NanoIntegris, Inc. |
105 |
|
Nanoledge, Inc. |
105 |
|
Nanotailor, Inc. |
107 |
|
Nanothinx S.A. |
108 |
|
Raymor Industries, Inc. |
109 |
|
Selah Technologies, LLC |
110 |
|
Shenzhen Nanotech Port Co., Ltd. |
111 |
|
Showa Denko KK |
111 |
|
SWeNT |
112 |
|
Thomas Swan & Co., Ltd. |
114 |
|
Unidym, Inc. |
115 |
|
Xintek, Inc. |
118 |
|
COMPANY PROFILES: CNT SPECIALTY AND ANCILLARY PRODUCTS |
119 |
|
Applied Nanotech Holdings, Inc. |
119 |
|
Brewer Science, Inc. |
120 |
|
Carbon Solutions, Inc. |
121 |
|
Eikos, Inc. |
121 |
|
First Nano, Inc. |
122 |
|
Nanomix, Inc. |
123 |
|
NanoComposites, Inc. |
124 |
|
Nanocomp Technologies, Inc. |
125 |
|
Q-Flo, Ltd. |
126 |
|
Zyvex Corp./Zyvex Performance Materials |
127 |
|
TABLE 36 ZYVEX PERFORMANCE MATERIALS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS IN CNT POLYMER COMPOSITES, 2007–2009 |
129 |
|
COMPANY PROFILES: LARGE U.S. CORPORATIONS |
129 |
|
TABLE 37 LARGE U.S. CORPORATIONS LEADING IN U.S. CNT PATENT ACTIVITY* (NUMBER) |
130 |
|
DuPont Co. |
131 |
|
General Electric Co. |
131 |
|
Hewlett Packard Co. |
132 |
|
Honeywell Int’l Inc. |
132 |
|
Intel Corp. |
132 |
|
IBM |
133 |
|
Motorola, Inc. |
133 |
|
Xerox Corp. |
135 |
|
COMPANY PROFILES: LARGE FOREIGN CORPORATIONS |
135 |
|
CHALLENGES AND ISSUES FACING THE CNT INDUSTRY |
135 |
|
Industry Driving Forces |
135 |
|
TABLE 38 EXEMPLARY COMPANIES LEADING THE CNT INDUSTRY EVOLUTION |
136 |
|
Nanotube Consumers and the Evolving Grade Structure |
136 |
|
TABLE 39 DIVERSITY IN CNT CONSUMER MARKET PRODUCTS |
136 |
|
Cost/Performance Balance |
137 |
|
Competition |
137 |
|
TABLE 40 COMPETITIVE MATERIAL ALTERNATIVES TO CNTS FOR CERTAIN APPLICATIONS |
138 |
|
Toxicity |
138 |
|
TABLE 41 PROGRESS IN IDENTIFYING AND RESOLVING CNT TOXICOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR, 2005-2007 |
139 |
|
TABLE 42 PROGRESS IN IDENTIFYING AND RESOLVING CNT TOXICOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR, 2008-SEPTEMBER 2009 |
141 |
|
Environmental Safety |
141 |
|
NANOTECHNOLOGY RISKS AND REGULATORY CONTROL |
143 |
|
Asian Initiatives |
143 |
|
Canadian Government |
144 |
|
European Commission |
144 |
|
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) |
145 |
|
U.S. Led Nanotechnology Regulatory Control Initiatives |
146 |
|
CBEN at Rice University |
147 |
|
City of Berkeley, CA, Nanomaterials Ordinance |
147 |
|
EPA |
148 |
|
Nanoethics and Social Advocacy Groups |
148 |
|
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars |
149 |
Chapter-6:
MARKETS BY APPLICATION
|
COMPOSITES |
151 |
|
TABLE 43 MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF CNTS COMPARED WITH OTHER FIBERS |
152 |
|
TABLE 44 CNT COMPOSITES: RANGE OF POSSIBLE APPLICATIONS |
152 |
|
TABLE 45 CNT COMPOSITES: PROPERTIES ENDOWED |
153 |
|
TABLE 46 MECHANICAL PROPERTY ENHANCEMENTS IN VARIOUS CNT COMPOSITES |
153 |
|
CEMENT MATRIX |
154 |
|
CERAMIC MATRIX |
155 |
|
TABLE 47 ENHANCEMENTS CLAIMED IN VARIOUS CNT CERAMIC SYSTEMS |
156 |
|
DIAMOND COMPOSITES |
160 |
|
GLASS MATRIX |
160 |
|
METAL MATRIX |
161 |
|
TABLE 48 SOME EXAMPLES OF CNT-METAL COMPOSITES |
162 |
|
POLYMER MATRIX |
163 |
|
TABLE 49 EXAMPLES OF CNT-POLYMER COMPOSITE MATRIX SYSTEMS AMENABLE TO COMMERCIAL PROCESSING AND APPLICATION |
164 |
|
TABLE 50 SOME EXAMPLES OF CNT-POLYMER COMPOSITES |
165 |
|
TABLE 51 VARIOUS PROCESSING STRATEGIES USED TO MANUFACTURE POLYMER-CNT COMPOSITES |
166 |
|
Electrical Conductivity Properties of Polymer-CNT Composites |
166 |
|
Mechanical Properties of Polymer-CNT Composites |
167 |
|
TABLE 52 ULTIMATE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF CNT FIBERS AND EXAMPLES OF THEIR ENHANCEMENT IN VARIOUS POLYMER COMPOSITE SYSTEMS |
167 |
|
TABLE 53 KEY PROPERTIES CONTROLLING ULTIMATE REINFORCING AND CONDUCTIVITY POTENTIAL OF SWNTS IN A POLYMER MATRIX |
168 |
|
Thermal Conductivity Properties of Polymer-CNT Composites |
168 |
|
Commercial Product Applications of Polymer-CNT Composites |
169 |
|
TABLE 54 POLYMER COMPOSITE CNT PRODUCTS CURRENTLY MANUFACTURED OR UNDER COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT |
169 |
|
TABLE 55 LEADING COMPANIES INVOLVED IN THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF CNT-POLYMER COMPOSITES |
170 |
|
TABLE 56 MOST ACTIVE COMPANIES ACCORDING TO CNT-POLYMER COMPOSITE U.S. PATENTS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
172 |
|
TABLE 57 OTHER ACTIVE ORGANIZATIONS ACCORDING TO U.S. CNT-POLYMER COMPOSITE PATENTS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 |
173 |
|
Automotive Applications |
173 |
|
TABLE 58 EXAMPLES OF READY-TO-MOLD HYPERION AUTOMOTIVE MWNT-RESIN COMPOUNDS |
173 |
|
TABLE 59 COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE FOR HYPERION CONDUCTIVE AUTOMOTIVE MWNT-RESIN COMPOUNDS |
174 |
|
TABLE 60 ADVANTAGES OF MWNTS COMPARED WITH CONVENTIONAL CONDUCTIVE FILLERS USED IN MOLDED AUTOMOTIVE PLASTICS |
175 |
|
TABLE 61 CLASSIFICATION OF CONDUCTIVE MOLDED PLASTICS ACCORDING TO FILLER LOADING AND ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES |
176 |
|
TABLE 62 VARIOUS APPLICATIONS OF MWNTS IN ELECTROSTATICALLY DISSIPATIVE PLASTIC AUTO COMPONENTS |
176 |
|
TABLE 63 ADVANCES IN IMPROVING THE STRENGTH AND CONDUCTIVITY OF POLYMER-CNT COMPOSITES, 2007–2009 |
180 |
|
Aeronautical Applications |
180 |
|
TABLE 64 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE AEROSPACE CF COMPOSITES INDUSTRY |
183 |
|
Electronic Applications |
184 |
|
TABLE 65 VARIOUS ELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS OF MWNTS IN MOLDED PLASTIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS |
184 |
|
Flame Retardant Applications |
185 |
|
Space Applications |
186 |
|
TABLE 66 FUTURE SPACE APPLICATIONS FOR CNTS |
187 |
|
Sporting Goods Applications |
187 |
|
TABLE 67 SPORTING GOODS PROTOTYPES BASED ON MWNT-PLASTIC COMPOSITES |
188 |
|
Other Applications and Important Property Considerations |
188 |
|
Biocatalytic Films |
188 |
|
Biomedical Composites |
189 |
|
Conventional Adhesives |
190 |
|
Dry Adhesives |
191 |
|
TABLE 68 RECENT PATENT ACTIVITY IN CNT DRY ADHESIVE SYSTEMS* |
191 |
|
Polymer Composite Coatings and Inks |
192 |
|
TABLE 69 ORGANIZATIONS EXPLORING CNT-BASED INKS AND SMART COATINGS |
192 |
|
TABLE 70 COMPARATIVE PROPERTY PERFORMANCE OF CONDUCTIVE TRANSPARENT COMPOSITE COATINGS |
193 |
|
Sensor Networks for Ongoing Composite Structural Diagnostics and Repair |
198 |
|
Surface Chemical Functionalization and Form Factor |
199 |
|
ELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS |
199 |
|
TABLE 71 U.S. ORGANIZATIONS LEADING THE ELECTRONICS SECTOR WITH CNT PATENTS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
200 |
|
TABLE 72 LEADING ASIAN AND EUROPEAN ORGANIZATIONS HOLDING ELECTRONICS CNT PATENTS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
201 |
|
ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS |
202 |
|
Emergence of Nanoelectronics |
202 |
|
TABLE 73 KEY CNT PROPERTIES ATTRACTING FUTURE ELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS |
204 |
|
CNT Electronic Components Development |
205 |
|
Synthesis and Characterization of Electronic-Grade SWNTs |
206 |
|
Electronic Device Integration and Self-Assembly |
210 |
|
Competition—Silicon Nanowires |
212 |
|
Connectivity and Large-Scale Integration |
213 |
|
Thermal Management (Solid-Based) |
216 |
|
TABLE 74 ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN CNT ELECTRONIC THERMAL MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS |
217 |
|
California Institute of Technology |
217 |
|
CAT Science/University of Copenhagen (Denmark) |
218 |
|
Fujitsu, Ltd. (Japan) |
218 |
|
IBM (Yorktown Heights, NY) |
218 |
|
Koila, Inc. (Sunnyvale, CA) |
218 |
|
LG Electronics (Korea) |
219 |
|
Molecular Nanosystems, Inc. (Palo Alto, CA) |
219 |
|
Nanoconduction, Inc. (Sunnyvale, CA)/NASA Ames Research Center |
219 |
|
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (Golden, CO) |
220 |
|
Nextreme Thermal Solutions (Research Triangle Park, NC) |
220 |
|
OCZ Technology (Sunnyvale, CA) |
220 |
|
Purdue University |
220 |
|
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute |
221 |
|
University of California, Berkeley |
221 |
|
University of Colorado |
221 |
|
Thermal Management (Liquid-Based) |
221 |
|
Cooligy, Inc. (Mountain View, CA) |
222 |
|
Seoul National University, Korea |
222 |
|
University of Leeds/Institute of Particle Science and Engineering, U.K. |
222 |
|
Beyond the CMOSFET Paradigm |
223 |
|
Current Industry FET Development |
223 |
|
TABLE 75 LEADING COMPANIES WITH CNTFET PATENT INTEREST |
224 |
|
GE Global Research Center |
224 |
|
IBM Optoelectronic Applications |
225 |
|
Infineon Technologies, Germany |
226 |
|
Development of Other CNT Nanoelectronic Components |
226 |
|
FE DISPLAYS AND RELATED DEVICES |
227 |
|
What is FE? |
227 |
|
Why CNTs are Attractive Material Candidates? |
227 |
|
TABLE 76 ADVANTAGES OF CNTS AS A COLD FE CATHODE |
228 |
|
FE Applications |
228 |
|
FE Displays |
229 |
|
Fabrication |
229 |
|
How CNT-FEDs Compare with Other Display Technologies |
230 |
|
TABLE 77 ADVANTAGES OF FE DISPLAYS OVER LCDS |
231 |
|
Major Factors Dictating CNT-FED Development |
231 |
|
TABLE 78 MAJOR FACTORS DICTATING EMERGENCE OF CNT-BASED TECHNOLOGY IN FPD MARKETPLACE |
231 |
|
Leading Organizations Involved in FED Development |
232 |
|
TABLE 79 LEADING U.S. ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN U.S. CNT-FED/FED PATENT ACTIVITY, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
232 |
|
TABLE 80 LEADING FOREIGN COUNTRIES INVOLVED IN U.S. CNT-FED/FED PATENT ACTIVITY, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
232 |
|
TABLE 81 MAJOR PLAYERS AND ANCILLIARY GROUPS/COMPANIES INVOLVED IN CNT-FED DEVELOPMENT |
233 |
|
TABLE 82 ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN CNT-FED PROTOTYPES, 2000-2009 |
234 |
|
Canon KK (Japan) |
234 |
|
cDream Corp. (San Jose, CA) |
235 |
|
CEA/LETI (France) |
236 |
|
CopyTele, Inc. (Melville, NY) |
237 |
|
Futaba Corp. (Japan) |
239 |
|
Japan, Inc. |
239 |
|
Motorola Laboratories (Tempe, AZ) |
240 |
|
TABLE 83 ADVANTAGES AND CHALLENGES OF MOTOROLA’S CNT-BASED FED COMPARED WITH EXISTENT FPD TECHNOLOGIES |
241 |
|
Nano-Proprietary/Applied Nanotech, Inc. (Austin, TX) |
241 |
|
Noritake Itron Corp./Ise Electronics (Japan) |
244 |
|
Printable Field Emitters, Ltd. (U.K.) |
244 |
|
Samsung (Korea) |
245 |
|
Taiwan, Inc. |
246 |
|
OTHER FED APPLICATIONS |
248 |
|
TABLE 84 EXAMPLES OF OTHER FED APPLICATIONS |
248 |
|
Light Bulbs and Light Sources |
249 |
|
TABLE 85 ADVANTAGES OF FE-CNT FLUORESCENT WHITE LIGHT SOURCE OVER CONVENTIONAL LAMPS |
251 |
|
TABLE 86 RATIONALIZING CNT SYNTHESIS WITH END-USE FE PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS |
251 |
|
Applications of CNT-Based FE Light Sources |
251 |
|
TABLE 87 ORGANIZATIONS WITH U.S. PATENT ACTIVITY RELATING TO CNT-BASED FE LIGHT SOURCES (NUMBER) |
252 |
|
Advance Nanotech, Inc./University of Bristol |
252 |
|
Ahwahnee Technology (San Jose, CA) |
253 |
|
Delta Optoelectronics, Inc. (Taiwan) |
253 |
|
Dialight Japan Co., Ltd. |
254 |
|
EPFL/NanoLight Int’l, Ltd. (Switzerland) |
255 |
|
Electrovac AG (Austria) |
255 |
|
Foxconn/Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. (Taiwan) |
255 |
|
Hanwha Chemical Co./Iljin Nanotech (Korea) |
256 |
|
IBM/Thomas J. Watson Research Center |
257 |
|
KAIST |
257 |
|
Nanoexa (Burlingame, CA) |
258 |
|
Nano-Proprietary/Advanced Nanotech Holdings, Inc. (Austin, TX) |
258 |
|
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea) |
259 |
|
Taitung University, Taiwan |
259 |
|
University of Surrey/Advanced Technology Institute (U.K.) |
260 |
|
FLEXIBLE DISPLAYS AND ELECTRONICS |
261 |
|
Advance Nanotech, Inc. (New York, NY)/Cambridge University, (U.K.) |
261 |
|
TABLE 88 LEADING ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN THE APPLICATION OF CNTS IN FLEXIBLE ELECTRONICS AND DISPLAYS |
262 |
|
Advanced Technology Institute/University of Surrey/Surrey Nanosystems, Ltd. |
263 |
|
Arrowhead Research (Pasadena, CA) |
264 |
|
DuPont Electronic Technologies (Hayward, CA) |
264 |
|
Eikos, Inc. (Franklin, MA) |
266 |
|
NanoIntegris, Inc. (Skokie, IL) |
266 |
|
NEC Corp. (Tokyo, Japan) |
266 |
|
Rennselaer Polytechnic Institute |
267 |
|
Unidym, Inc. (Menlo Park, CA) |
267 |
|
University of Illinois/Semprius, Inc. (Durham, NC) |
269 |
|
MEMORY APPLICATIONS |
269 |
|
TABLE 89 ATTRACTIVE PROPERTIES OF CNTS FOR MEMORY APPLICATIONS |
270 |
|
TABLE 90 LEADING PLAYERS IN CNT-MEMORY INITIATIVES BASED ON U.S. PATENTS, 1997-JULY 25, 2006 (NUMBER) |
272 |
|
Nantero, Inc. (Woburn, MA) |
273 |
|
ENERGY CONVERSION AND STORAGE |
275 |
|
BATTERIES |
276 |
|
Lead-Acid Batteries |
276 |
|
Lithium-Ion Batteries |
276 |
|
Lithium Polymer Batteries |
278 |
|
CNT Commercial Battery Developments |
279 |
|
TABLE 91 LEADING PLAYERS IN CNT-BASED BATTERY TECHNOLOGY ACCORDING TO U.S. PATENT ACTIVITY, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
279 |
|
Micro Bubble Technologies, Inc. (South Korea)/Next Alternative, Inc. (Canada) |
280 |
|
FUEL CELLS |
281 |
|
TABLE 92 CNTS ENDEARING PROPERTIES USED IN FUEL CELL APPLICATIONS |
282 |
|
Hydrogen Fuel Cells |
282 |
|
TABLE 93 KEY PROPERTIES AFFECTING FUEL CELL PERFORMANCE |
283 |
|
DMFC |
283 |
|
Substitution of CNTs in MEA Materials |
284 |
|
CNTs Used in Hydrogen and DMFCs |
285 |
|
Optimizing Catalyst Loading and Retention |
285 |
|
CNT-Based MEAs |
286 |
|
Critical Fuel Cell Components |
286 |
|
GDLs |
286 |
|
Surface Wettability |
287 |
|
Early Commercial Applications and Development of Fuel Cells |
288 |
|
TABLE 94 LEADING ORGANIZATIONS PATENTING U.S. CNT FUEL CELL ENHANCEMENTS, 2002-DECEMBER 30, 2006 |
289 |
|
More Recent Patent Activity and Commercial Developments |
289 |
|
TABLE 95 PATENT ACTIVITY IN U.S. CNT-BASED FUEL CELL APPLICATIONS AMONG U.S. ORGANIZATIONS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
290 |
|
TABLE 96 PATENT ACTIVITY IN U.S. CNT-BASED FUEL CELL APPLICATIONS AMONG FOREIGN ORGANIZATIONS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
290 |
|
Intematix Corp. (Fremont, CA) |
291 |
|
Japan, Inc. |
292 |
|
Motorola, Inc. (Tempe, AZ) |
292 |
|
MTI MicroFuel Cells, Inc. (Albany, NY) |
294 |
|
Neah Power Systems, Inc. (Bothel, WA) |
295 |
|
Pacific Fuel Cell Corp. (Riverside, CA) |
295 |
|
Show Denko KK (Japan) |
295 |
|
UltraCell Corp. (Livermore, CA) |
296 |
|
HYDROGEN STORAGE |
297 |
|
Carbon Nanostructures |
298 |
|
Underlying System Properties |
299 |
|
Commercial Development and Patent Activity |
300 |
|
TABLE 97 PATENT ACTIVITY IN U.S. CNT-BASED HYDROGEN STORAGE APPLICATIONS, 1997-APRIL 2006 (NUMBER) |
301 |
|
TABLE 98 PATENT ACTIVITY IN U.S. CNT-BASED HYDROGEN STORAGE APPLICATIONS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
301 |
|
Nanomix, Inc. |
302 |
|
Motorola, Inc. |
303 |
|
Sony Corporation |
303 |
|
CAPACITORS |
303 |
|
Basic Characteristics |
303 |
|
TABLE 99 PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES |
304 |
|
TABLE 100 ADVANTAGES OF SUPERCAPACITOR ELECTRICAL STORAGE DEVICES COMPARED WITH BATTERIES |
305 |
|
TABLE 101 COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE OF BATTERIES VERSUS CAPACITORS |
305 |
|
EDLC |
305 |
|
Research Activities in CNT-Based EDLCs |
307 |
|
Georgia Institute of Technology Textile and Fiber Engineering |
307 |
|
INRS (Quebec, Canada) |
307 |
|
MIT Laboratory for Electromagnetic and Electronic Systems (LEES) |
308 |
|
NASA Johnson Space Center |
309 |
|
National Institute of AIST (Japan) |
309 |
|
Stanford University/UCLA |
309 |
|
University of California, Davis |
310 |
|
University of Cambridge/Department of Engineering (U.K.) |
311 |
|
University of Southern California (USC) |
312 |
|
University of Texas at Austin |
312 |
|
University of Texas at Dallas/NanoTech Institute |
312 |
|
Early Patent Activity and Commercial Development in CNT-Based EDLCs |
313 |
|
GSI Creos Corp., Asahi Glass, and TDK (Japan) |
313 |
|
TABLE 102 U.S. PATENT ACTIVITY IN U.S. CNT-BASED EDL CAPACITORS AND APPLICATIONS, 1997-DECEMBER 30, 2006 (NUMBER) |
314 |
|
Hyperion Catalysis Int’l |
314 |
|
Iljin Nanotech (Korea) |
314 |
|
Recent Patent Activity and Commercial Development in CNT-Based EDLCs |
315 |
|
TABLE 103 LEADING ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN U.S. CNT-BASED EDL CAPACITOR PATENT ACTIVITY, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
315 |
|
Arrowhead Research Corp./Agonn Systems, Inc. (Pasadena, CA) |
315 |
|
Kemet Corp. (Greenville, SC) |
316 |
|
Nisshinbo Holdings, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan) |
316 |
|
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) |
317 |
|
SOLAR/PV CELLS |
317 |
|
Basic Characteristics |
317 |
|
Academic Research |
319 |
|
TABLE 104 ACADEMIC RESEARCH ACTIVITIES IN CNT-BASED SOLAR CELLS |
319 |
|
Commercial Development |
320 |
|
TABLE 105 CNT PATENT ACTIVITY IN SOLAR CELL APPLICATIONS, 1997-DECEMBER 30, 2006 (NUMBER) |
321 |
|
TABLE 106 PATENT ACTIVITY IN CNT-BASED SOLAR CELL APPLICATIONS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
321 |
|
Ambit Corp. (Ashland, MA) |
322 |
|
Arrowhead Research Corp./Nanopolaris (Pasadena, CA) |
322 |
|
BP Solar North America (Frederick, MA) |
323 |
|
DuPont (Wilmington, DE) |
324 |
|
Dow Corning Corp. (Midland, MI) |
324 |
|
Eikos, Inc. (Franklin, MA) |
325 |
|
First Solar, LLC (Phoenix, AZ) |
326 |
|
HelioVolt Corp. (Austin, TX) |
326 |
|
Innovalight, Inc. (Manhasset, NY) |
327 |
|
Konarka Technologies (Lowell, MA) |
327 |
|
Miasolé (San Jose, CA) |
328 |
|
Nanosolar, Inc. (Palo Alto, CA) |
328 |
|
Plextronics, Inc. (Pittsburg, PA) |
329 |
|
Wakonda Technologies, Inc./RIT |
330 |
|
OTHER ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS |
330 |
|
TABLE 107 PATENT ACTIVITY IN U.S. CNT-BASED APPLICATIONS USED IN OTHER ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
330 |
|
Mechanical Energy Storage |
331 |
|
Thermionic Power |
331 |
|
Thermal Rectifiers |
332 |
|
MEMBRANES: FILTRATION AND SEPARATION MEDIA |
333 |
|
TABLE 108 ATTRACTIVE PROPERTIES OF CNTS AS SEPARATION MEMBRANES |
334 |
|
DEVELOPMENTS AND APPLICATIONS |
334 |
|
TABLE 109 ORGANIZATIONS WITH U.S. PATENT ACTIVITY IN CNT MEMBRANES, FILTRATION AND SEPARATION MEDIA, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
334 |
|
TABLE 110 RESEARCH AND COMMERCIAL PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENTS OF VARIOUS CNT-BASED MEMBRANE SEPARATION TECHNOLOGIES |
335 |
|
Biosource, Inc./Voltea, Ltd. (London, U.K.) |
336 |
|
Clemson University |
336 |
|
Cnanoz, Inc (Research Triangle Park, NC) |
337 |
|
Covalent Industrial Technologies, LLC (Hayward, CA) |
337 |
|
LLNL |
338 |
|
Philip Morris USA Research Center |
340 |
|
Procter & Gamble Co. |
341 |
|
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute |
341 |
|
Seldon Laboratories, LLC |
342 |
|
University of Kentucky, Center for Applied Energy Research |
343 |
|
Velocys, Inc. (Plain City, OH)/Oxford Catalysts Group plc (Oxford, U.K.) |
343 |
|
SENSORS |
344 |
|
TYPES OF SENSORS |
344 |
|
TABLE 111 TYPES OF CNT SENSORS |
345 |
|
Biosensors |
345 |
|
TABLE 112 TYPES OF CNT BIOSENSOR SYSTEMS |
345 |
|
Chemical Sensors |
346 |
|
TABLE 113 KEY PROPERTIES OF CNTS EXPLOITED IN SENSOR APPLICATIONS |
347 |
|
Physical Sensors and Actuators |
348 |
|
RECENT PATENT ACTIVITY IN SENSORS |
349 |
|
TABLE 114 LEADING ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN U.S. CNT-SENSOR PATENT ACTIVITY, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
349 |
|
COMMERCIAL PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENTS |
350 |
|
Applied Nanotech Holdings, Inc. (Austin, TX) |
350 |
|
Gated Metal Oxide Sensor |
350 |
|
Palladium Nanoparticle Hydrogen Sensor |
350 |
|
Photoacoustic Sensor (PAS) |
351 |
|
Other Recent Sensor and Detector-Related Developments |
351 |
|
Honeywell Int’l, Inc. (Morristown, NJ) |
352 |
|
Motorola Laboratories (Tempe, AZ) |
352 |
|
Nanomix, Inc. (Emeryville, CA) |
353 |
|
Nanosensors, Inc.(Santa Clara, CA) |
354 |
|
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA |
355 |
|
YTC America, Inc. (Camarillo, CA) |
357 |
|
OTHER APPLICATIONS |
357 |
|
BIOSENSORS |
357 |
|
Alpha Szenszor, Inc. (Worcester, MA) |
358 |
|
Applied Nanotech Holdings, Inc. (Austin, TX) |
358 |
|
Nanomix, Inc. (Emeryville, CA)/MysticMD, Inc. (Groton, CT) |
359 |
|
BIOMEDICAL DEVELOPMENTS |
359 |
|
TABLE 115 POTENTIAL USES OF CNTS IN THE BIOMEDICAL AREA |
359 |
|
TABLE 116 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENTS IN CNT BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS, PRIOR TO 2007 |
360 |
|
TABLE 117 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENTS IN CNT BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS, 2007-2009 |
361 |
|
Potential Commercial CNT Biomedical Developments |
362 |
|
Chromoz, Inc. (Research Triangle Park, NC) |
362 |
|
Intel Corp. (Santa Clara, CA) |
363 |
|
XinRay Systems, LLC (Research Triangle Park, NC) |
363 |
|
CATALYST SUPPORTS |
364 |
|
Industrial Chemical Process Synthesis |
364 |
|
TABLE 118 U.S. PATENT ACTIVITY LEADERS IN CNT CATALYST SUPPORTS, 2007-SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
365 |
|
BTU Int’l, Inc. (North Billerica, MA) |
366 |
|
Headwaters Technology Innovation, Inc. (Lawrenceville, NJ) |
366 |
|
Hyperion Catalysis Int’l, Inc. (Cambridge, MA) |
366 |
|
Electrocatalysis |
366 |
|
Photocatalytic Support Systems |
367 |
|
TABLE 119 APPLICATIONS OF CNTS IN PHOTOCATALYTIC SYSTEMS |
367 |
|
ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY |
368 |
|
Xerox Corp. (Stamford, CT) |
368 |
|
INSTRUMENTS: ACTUATORS, MANIPULATORS AND PROBES |
368 |
|
TABLE 120 U.S. CNT PATENT ACTIVITY INVOLVING ACTUATORS, INSTRUMENTS AND MANIPULATORS, 2007-JUNE 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
368 |
|
Commercial Developments in SPM/AFM CNT Probes |
369 |
|
Carbon Design Innovations (Burlingame, CA) |
370 |
|
Carbon Nanoprobes, Inc. (White Plains, NY) |
370 |
|
Xidex Corp. (Austin, TX) |
371 |
|
OIL RECOVERY |
372 |
|
TABLE 121 U.S. PATENT ACTIVITY IN CNT ENHANCEMENTS IN OIL RECOVERY, 2007-SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 (NUMBER) |
372 |
|
SECURITY |
373 |
|
TABLE 122 LEADING ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN VARIOUS CNT-BASED SECURITY APPLICATIONS |
373 |
|
Bioterrorism and Explosives Detection |
374 |
|
Stanford University |
374 |
|
MIT |
375 |
|
Body Armor and Smart Textiles |
375 |
|
National Research Council Canada (Ottawa, Canada) |
375 |
|
Nanocomp Technologies, Inc. (Concord, NH) |
376 |
|
Q-Flo, Ltd. (Cambridge, U.K.) |
376 |
|
Nico Technologies (Ann Arbor, MI) |
377 |
|
RFID Tags |
377 |
|
Alien Technology Corp. (Morgan Hills, CA) |
378 |
|
Ambient Systems, B.V. (Enschede, Netherlands) |
378 |
|
AMBIT Corp. (Ashland, MA) |
379 |
|
Nantero Inc. (Woburn, MA)/Hewlett-Packard Specialty Printing Systems (San Diego, CA) |
380 |
|
X-Ray Detection |
380 |
|
American Science and Engineering, Inc. (Billerica, MA) |
381 |
|
XinRay Systems, LLC (Research Triangle Park, NC) |
381 |
|
POLISHING |
382 |
|
Applied Materials, Inc. (Santa Clara, CA) |
382 |
Chapter-7:
MARKET ANALYSIS
|
TECHNOLOGY PUSH |
383 |
|
CNT COMMERCIAL PRODUCTION AND ESTIMATED SALES REVENUES |
383 |
|
MWNTs |
383 |
|
TABLE 123 CONFIRMED ANNUAL PRODUCTION COMMITMENT OF COMMERCIAL MWNTS: TIER 1 COMPANIES, 2009-2014 (METRIC TONS) |
384 |
|
TABLE 124 UNCONFIRMED ANNUAL PRODUCTION COMMITMENT OF COMMERCIAL MWNTS: TIER 2 COMPANIES, 2009-2014 (METRIC TONS) |
384 |
|
TABLE 125 GLOBAL MARKET FORECAST FOR MWNT PRODUCTION REVENUES, THROUGH 2014 ($ MILLIONS) |
385 |
|
SWNTs |
386 |
|
TABLE 126 UNCONFIRMED ANNUAL PRODUCTION COMMITMENT OF COMMERCIAL SWNTS: TIER 1 AND 2 COMPANIES, 2009-2014 (KG) |
386 |
|
TABLE 127 MARKET FORECAST FOR SWNT PRODUCTION AND REVENUES: TIER 1 COMPANIES, THROUGH 2014 |
387 |
|
Other Specialty Grades |
388 |
|
TABLE 128 FORECAST FOR SPECIALTY FWNTS PRODUCTION REVENUES, THROUGH 2014 |
388 |
|
Other Companies Influencing CNT Exploitation |
388 |
|
TABLE 129 OTHER COMPANIES AIDING CNT COMMERCIALIZATION |
389 |
|
Carbon Solutions, Inc. |
390 |
|
NanoIntegris, Inc. |
390 |
|
Brewer Science, Inc. |
390 |
|
MARKET PULL |
390 |
|
MARKET PROSPECTS FOR CNTS IN POLYMER COMPOSITES |
391 |
|
AERONAUTICAL APPLICATIONS |
391 |
|
AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS |
393 |
|
ELECTRONIC PACKAGING APPLICATIONS |
395 |
|
FLAME-RETARDANT APPLICATIONS |
395 |
|
INDUSTRIAL SEALS |
395 |
|
SPORTS EQUIPMENT APPLICATIONS |
396 |
|
OTHER COMPETITIVE FACTORS AND DEVELOPMENTS |
397 |
|
MARKET PROSPECTS FOR CNTS IN OTHER MATRIX COMPOSITES |
398 |
|
MARKET PROSPECTS FOR CNTS IN ELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS |
399 |
|
ELECTRONIC/NANOELECTRONIC COMPONENTS |
399 |
|
FE DISPLAYS AND RELATED DEVICES |
400 |
|
FE Displays |
400 |
|
TABLE 130 PROS AND CONS FOR CNT FE DISPLAY MARKET |
401 |
|
MARKET CHALLENGES: COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND MANUFACTURING COST |
401 |
|
COMMERCIAL CHAMPIONS—WHO’S LEADING THE CHASE AND WHEN? |
402 |
|
LIGHT BULBS AND LIGHT SOURCES |
404 |
|
FLEXIBLE DISPLAYS AND ELECTRONICS |
406 |
|
MEMORY APPLICATIONS |
408 |
|
SENSORS |
410 |
|
Alpha Szenszor, Inc. (Worcester, MA) |
411 |
|
Applied Nanotech Holdings, Inc. (Austin, TX) |
411 |
|
Nanomix, Inc. (Emeryville, CA)/Mystic MD, Inc. (Groton, CT) |
411 |
|
MARKET PROSPECTS FOR CNTS IN ENERGY APPLICATIONS |
412 |
|
BATTERIES |
412 |
|
Market Prognosis |
412 |
|
CNT Commercial Battery Developments |
412 |
|
Micro Bubble Technologies, Inc. (South Korea)/Next Alternative, Inc. (Canada) |
413 |
|
Other Potential Battery Developments |
413 |
|
CAPACITORS |
414 |
|
Market Prognosis of Commercial Development in CNT-Based Supercapacitors |
414 |
|
Recent Patent Activity and Commercial Development in CNT-Based EDLCs |
415 |
|
Arrowhead Research Corp./Agonn Systems, Inc. (Pasadena, CA) |
415 |
|
Kemet Corp. (Greenville, SC) |
415 |
|
Nisshinbo Holdings, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan) |
416 |
|
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) |
416 |
|
FUEL CELLS |
416 |
|
Recent Patent Activity and Commercial Development in CNT-Based Fuel Cells |
417 |
|
Intematix Corp. (Fremont, CA) |
417 |
|
Japan, Inc. |
418 |
|
Neah Power Systems, Inc. (Bothel, WA) |
418 |
|
Pacific Fuel Cell Corp. (Riverside, CA) |
418 |
|
Show Denko KK (Japan) |
419 |
|
UltraCell Corp. (Livermore, CA) |
419 |
|
HYDROGEN STORAGE |
420 |
|
SOLAR/PV CELLS |
420 |
|
Ambit Corp. (Ashland, MA) |
421 |
|
DuPont (Wilmington, DE) |
421 |
|
Eikos, Inc. (Franklin, MA) |
422 |
|
Konarka Technologies (Lowell, MA) |
422 |
|
THERMIONIC POWER, RECTIFIERS AND MECHANICAL ENERGY STORAGE |
422 |
|
MARKET PROSPECTS FOR CNTS IN OTHER APPLICATIONS |
422 |
|
CATALYST SUPPORTS |
422 |
|
INSTRUMENTS: ACTUATORS, MANIPULATORS AND PROBES |
423 |
|
MEMBRANES AND SEPARATION TECHNOLOGY |
423 |
|
SECURITY |
425 |
|
RFID Tags |
425 |
|
Alien Technology Corp. (Morgan Hills, CA) |
425 |
|
Ambient Systems, B.V. (Enschede, Netherlands) |
425 |
|
AMBIT Corp. (Ashland, MA) |
426 |
|
Nantero Inc. (Woburn, MA)/Hewlett-Packard Specialty Printing Systems (San Diego, CA) |
426 |
|
X-ray Detection |
426 |
|
XinRay Systems, LLC (Research Triangle Park, NC) |
426 |
|
APPENDIX |
428 |
|
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS |
|
Choose a currency below to display product prices in the selected currency.
